တိုက်ိဳ၊ မတ္(၁၄)
သတင္း-သန္႔မ်ိဳးေထြး၊ နန္းအိမြန္ခ်စ္
မတ္လ(၁၃)ရက္ေန႔တြင္ က်ေရာက္ခဲ့သည့္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံလူ႔အခြင့္အေရးေန႔အထိမ္းအမွတ္အျဖစ္ ဂ်ပန္ႏိုင္ငံ၊ တိုက်ိဳျမိဳ႕တြင္ မ်က္ေမွာက္ကာလ စစ္အစိုးရ၏ဖိႏွိပ္ခ်ဳပ္ခ်ယ္မႈေၾကာင့္ တိုင္းရင္းသားမ်ားႏွင့္ျမန္မာျပည္သူမ်ား၏ လူသားဆိုင္ရာအခြင့္အေရးမ်ား ဆံုရံူးေပ်ာက္ကြယ္ေနပံုတို႔ကို ဂ်ပန္ေရာက္ျမန္မာဒီမိုကေရစီေရးလႈပ္ရွားသူမ်ားက ဦးေဆာင္၍ ဂ်ပန္လူမ်ိဳးမ်ားအၾကား ပိုမိုသိရွိႏိုင္ရန္ ဂ်ပန္ဘာသာျဖင့္ ေဟာေျပာေဆြးေႏြးပြဲတခုကို က်င္းပျပဳလုပ္ခဲ့ၾကသည္။
Kanda တကၠသိုလ္မွသမိုင္းပါေမာကၡေဒါက္တာေအးခ်မ္းက"ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္မွဴးၾကီးသန္းေရႊကို ႏိုင္ငံတကာတရားရံုးတင္ဖို႔ဆိုတာနဲ႔ပါတ္သတ္လို႔ ဒီစစ္အစိုးရဟာ လူအခြင့္အေရးကိုခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ေနတယ္ဆိုတာ လူတိုင္းသိတယ္၊ တင္ႏိုင္ဖို႔မတင္ႏိုင္ဖို႔ကတပိုင္းေပါ့၊ ဒါေပမဲ့လူ႔သမိုင္းကို ျပန္ၾကည့္ရင္ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးကို ခ်ိဳးေဖာက္တယ္ဆိုတဲ့ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြဟာ အာဏာလက္ရွိရွိေနခ်ိန္မွာ ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ကိုကာကြယ္ဖို႔ဆိုတဲ့အေၾကာင္းျပခ်က္နဲ႔ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးကို ခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ခြင့္မရွိဘူး၊ ဥပမာ-လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးကိုခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ခဲ့တဲ့ ဆာဗီးယားသမၼတဆလိုဗိုဒင္မီလိုဆီဗစ္ကို ရံုးတင္တဲ့ကိစၥလိုမ်ိဳး သူ႕ကိုရံုးတင္လို႔မရဘူးဆိုတာမရွိဘူး။ သို႔ေသာ္ ႏိုင္ငံေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြဟာ အာဏာလက္ရွိ ရွိေနခ်ိန္မွာဘယ္ေတာ့မွတရားရံုးကိုဆြဲတင္လို႔မရဘူးဆိုတာကိုေတာ့ သတိထားရမယ္။"ဟုရွင္းျပသည္။
လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးမ်ားႏွင့္ပါတ္သတ္၍ အသက္ရွင္သန္ပိုင္ခြင့္၊ အမ်ိဳးသမီးမ်ားအခြင့္၊ ကေလးသူငယ္မ်ားဆိုင္ရာအခြင့္အေရး၊ အလုပ္သမားအခြင့္အေရး၊ လြတ္လပ္စြာစီးပြားရွာခြင့္၊ လြပ္လပ္ေသာလူမႈေရးအခြင့္အေရးစသျဖင့္ အမ်ိဳးမ်ိဳးရွိေသာ္လည္း ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံတြင္ အဆိုပါအခြင့္အေရးမ်ားဆိတ္သုန္းေနျပီျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ၄င္းမွရွင္းလင္းေျပာျပသြားသည္။
၁၉၈၈ခုႏွစ္ မတ္လ(၁၃)ရက္ေန႔တြင္ လံုထိန္းရဲမ်ားက စက္မႈတကၠသိုလ္ေက်ာင္းသားကိုဖုန္းေမာ္ကို ဥပေဒမဲ့ရိုက္ႏွက္မႈေၾကာင့္ က်ဆံုးကြယ္လြန္းသြားခဲ့ရာမွ (၈၈)အေရးေတာ္ပံုၾကီးေပၚေပါက္လာခဲ့ျပီး ယခုစစ္အာဏာရွင္မ်ားနည္းတူ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးကိုခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ေနသည့္ တပါတီ အာဏာရွင္ဦးေန၀င္းအစိုးရကိုျဖဳတ္ခ်ႏိုင္ခဲ့သည့္အတြက္ ထိုေန႔ကိုျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံလူ႔အခြင့္အေရးေန႔ဟုသတ္မွတ္ခဲ့ၾကျခင္းျဖစ္သည္။
တိုင္းရင္းသားႏွင့္လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးအေၾကာင္းကို ေအယူအန္ဥကၠ႒ဦးစိုင္းစီ၀မ္းမွလည္ေကာင္း၊ လူ႔အခြင့္ေန႔အေၾကာင္းကို ဦးေက်ာ္ေက်ာ္စိုးမွ လည္ေကာင္း ရွင္းလင္းေျပာျပသြားခဲ့ျပီး Ruman Right Watchမွဂ်ပန္ပညာရွင္မ်ားႏွင့္ ျမန္မာ့အေရးကိုေဆာင္ရြက္ေနသူ ေရွ႔ေနၾကီးရူိဂို၀ါတာနာဘဲတို႔မွရွင္းလင္းေျပာျပရာတြင္ နအဖ၏အတုအေယာင္ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲျပီးစီးသြား၍ ဂ်ပန္အစိုးရမွဒုကၡသည္ေလွ်ာက္ထားေနထိုင္သူမ်ားကို ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံသို႔အတင္းအက်ပ္ျပန္ပို႔မည္ဆိုပါက ၄င္းတို႔ထံအသိေပးအေၾကာင္းၾကားေစလိုေၾကာင္း၊ ၄င္းတို႔မွအဆိုပါကိစၥအတြက္ဆန္႔က်င္ကန္ကြက္တိုက္ဖ်က္သြားမည္ဟု ရွင္းလင္းေျပာျပသြားသည္။
KEIO တကၠသိုလ္မွဥပေဒေက်ာင္းသူ Miki Kurodaက"အစကေတာ့ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးဆိုတာနဲ႔ပါတ္သတ္ျပီး အခ်က္အလက္လိုခ်င္လို႔ ဒီပြဲကိုလာခဲ့တာဘဲ၊ သို႔ေသာ္အခုျမန္မာစစ္အစိုးရဲ႔လုပ္ရပ္ေတြေၾကာင့္ျမန္မာ့အေရးကိုပိုစိတ္၀င္စားလာခဲ့တယ္၊ ေနာက္ပိုင္းမွာလဲ ျမန္မာ့အေရးကို လုပ္ေဆာင္ဖို႔အထိ ဆံုးျဖတ္လိုက္တယ္"ဟုေျပာျပသည္။
အဆိုပါေက်ာင္းသူႏွစ္ဦးမွာ နအဖစစ္အစိုးရမွျမန္မာျပည္သူမ်ားကို လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးဆိုင္ရာဖိႏွိပ္ခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ခ်ဳပ္ခ်ဝ္ေနမႈမ်ားကို ဂ်ပန္လူမ်ိဳးမ်ားသိရွိႏိုင္ေစ ရန္အတြက္ ၄င္းတို႔တကၠသိုလ္မ်ားတြင္ ျပပြဲေဟာေျပာပြဲတခုကို ျပဳလုပ္ရန္ရည္ရြယ္ထားေၾကာင္းသိရသည္။
တိုက်ိဳျမိဳ႕ အိုခ်ေနာ့မိဇုအရပ္ရွိ ဂ်ပန္အလုပ္သမားသမဂၢ(Rengo)ရံုး၌ မတ္လ(၁၄)ရက္ေန႔ကျပဳလုပ္သည့္ အဆိုပါပြဲသို႔ဂ်ပန္အဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ားျဖစ္သည့္ APFS Union, Rengo, Ruma Right Watch, PFBႏွင့္ Meijiro တကၠသိုလ္ႏွင့္ KEIOတကၠသိုလ္တို႔မွ ေက်ာင္းသူမ်ားႏွင့္စိတ္ပါ၀င္စားသူ ၁၀၀ခန္႔တက္ေရာက္ခဲ့ၾကျပီး ေန႔လည္ ၁ နာရီမွ ညေန ၄ နာရီခြဲအထိ ေဟာေျပာေဆြးေႏြးခဲ့ၾကသည္။
.jpg)
2 comments:
Stability impossible without 'responsibility'
The human rights movement, like the democratic movement, has been sweeping across the globe. Politicians from the East and the West are seizing the opportunity, and mobilizing large numbers of people to pressure their governments to implement laws protecting human rights.
The term human rights sound like a wonderful concept. Many world's crossroads, has also been affected by this call for human rights. Yet, few of us have really sat down to examine what we mean by human rights.
Presumably when we talk of this concept, we are referring to something that "the government cannot take away" from a person. It is a concept that implies ownership of something. The most famous human right is that of free speech, enshrined in the United States Constitution.
However, what does it actually mean in practice? If you walked in front of the White House with a placard declaring your intention to kill the US president, you would quickly be arrested. Take another example. The rights of the non-smoker in a theatre are protected by prohibiting smokers from lighting up their cigarettes.
In other words, one person's right is another person's limitation. That's why we always hear phrases like "fighting for our rights". It is a fight because if one person is given a right, another person may, as a consequence, be deprived of a right.
Any system that is based on a series of conflicts is unstable and a balance can only be found through what I would call external force. By that I mean the legal and judicial systems and the police, who enforce the decisions of the legislature and the Judiciary. That is why the country that has the largest number of rights for its people also has the highest number of laws and the largest police force. The system in the US proves my point.
Because stability is only maintained by the presence of the police force, whenever officers turn their backs, chaos erupts. In January of year 1997, an armored truck overturned in Florida, and spilled half a million dollars on to the road. Less than $30 was recovered.
By contrast, look at the major earthquake in 1995, which hit the city of Kobe, in Japan. The world watched in awe as the people of Kobe tried to recover from their misfortune. Television cameras showed collapsed homes with money and jewellery lying everywhere, yet people just walked on by and left the valuables untouched. Police and soldiers were not called out to deal with looting, because there was no looting.
The reason for this is simple. The Japanese culture is probably the only one left in the world that is built entirely on the concept of "responsibility" rather than of “rights".
A system based on "responsibility" is inherently a stable system.
In fact, a system built on the foundation stone of responsibility is harmonious, stable, highly efficient, flexible, dynamic and liberating. This idea of responsibility is mostly found in the ancient Eastern thinking of, for example, China, Korea and Japan.
By contrast, a system built on the foundation stone of "rights" is confrontational, unstable, inefficient, rigid, static, binding and restrictive. This idea of rights is prevalent in modern Western thinking, in Europe and the US.
It is easy to see why the ancient sages of China talked about responsibility rather than rights.
Kobe is a shining example of what can achieved anywhere in the world.
But to achieve that sort of society, we must abandon the whole idea of "human rights" and, instead, embrace the idea of "human responsibility".
The question now is: are we going to blindly follow the idea of "rights" and risk destroying everything, or are we going to champion the idea of "responsibility" and start building a society of which we can all be proud?
UN Sec, Ben Ki Moon, or US senator Jimmy Webb may have met 10 political parties, groups of cease fire or those which has peace with SPDC. But it is evident that they all are behind NLD, the west is openly supporting NLD led by Aung San Suu Kyi. One sided support for NLD. This is the west, so called international community who wants to see Free and Fair elections in Union of Myanmar. In this political game, NLD has all the advantages. It has all the ‘jokers’ in the pack of cards, in hand. Other political parties have none, they all have plane cards. How Fair and how Free will it be, Buddha alone will know.
The interference of UN, the interference of the so called international community is already there. They are not for Free and Fair, they are not for Justice or Equality. They are all for NLD. In this political game, how much is the bluff, how much is it true, everyone has their own vies and opinions. The west never consider Union of Myanmar as nation , the west never considered the people of Myanmar as human beings.
The west is the west, by when it comes to international community, we have to be careful who are in this so called international community. We need to sift out and look very carefully, what this so called international community consists off.
The west, always get involve in the affairs or others, self appointed boss, patronising, bullying everyone. If that fails, they use force, their military might. They created make believe stories. Believe it or not, they don’t care anything, they don’t care anybody.
Union of Myanmar is at the door step of China, like N. Korea. If US and its allies troops are there in Myanmar. It won’t be safe for Myanmar, it won’t be safe for China. The same, if China is a friend, US and the west worries, That is what they want Myanmar, They want somebody in Myanmar they can trust, they can rely on depend on.
China does not have to be in Union of Myanmar, because it is only a door step away, China does not have to fly in or sail into Myanmar, they can come in on foot. China never has been N. Korea. Have you seen any Chinese military base in any other nations? Russian military base, navel base?
John Yettaw the American said , he came to warn Aung San Suu Kyi. But we don’t hear him say who tried to kill Aung San Suu Kyi. Possible was it was not SPDC, otherwise the whole world will know. Something is not right there. Something is missing.
Post a Comment